The role of genetics in the treatment of dystonia with deep brain stimulation: Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions that lead to involuntary postures or repetitive movements. Genetic mutations are being increasingly recognized as a cause of dystonia. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is one of the limited treatment options available. However, there are varying reports on its efficacy in genetic dystonias. This systematic review of the characteristics of genetic dystonias treated with DBS and their outcomes aims to aid in the evaluation of eligibility for such treatment. METHODS: We performed a PUBMED search of all papers related to genetic dystonias and DBS up until April 2022. In addition to performing a systematic review, we also performed a meta-analysis to assess the role of the mutation on DBS response. We included cases that had a confirmed genetic mutation and DBS along with pre-and post-operative BFMDRS. RESULTS: Ninety-one reports met our inclusion criteria and from them, 235 cases were analyzed. Based on our analysis DYT-TOR1A dystonia had the best evidence for DBS response and Rapid-Onset Dystonia Parkinsonism was among the least responsive to DBS. CONCLUSION: While our report supports the role of genetics in DBS selection and response, it is limited by the rarity of the individual genetic conditions, the reliance on case reports and case series, and the limited ability to obtain genetic testing on a large scale in real-time as opposed to retrospectively as in many cases.

Electrophysiological variability as marker of dystonia worsening under deep brain stimulation successive withdrawal and renewal effects.

DBS has been shown to be an effective intervention for neurological disorders. However, the intervention is complex and many aspects have not been understood. Various clinical situations have no solution and follow trial and error approaches. Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by involuntary muscle contractions, which gives rise to abnormal movements and postures. Status dystonicus (SD) represents a life-threatening condition that requires urgent assessment and management. Electrophysiological markers for risk of symptom worsening and SD related patterns of evolution in patients treated with long-term deep brain stimulation (DBS), and specially under the effect of withdrawal and renewals of simulation are needed. To this end, we study the variability of neural synchronization as a mechanism for symptom generation under successive perturbations to a system, i.e. withdrawals and renewals of neuromodulation, through computational simulation of clinical profiles under different plasticity conditions. The simulation shows that the neuroplasticity makeup influences the variability of oscillation synchronization patterns in virtual "patients". The difference between the effect of different electrophysiological signatures is remarkable and under a certain condition (equal medium long term potentiation and long term depression) the situation resembles that of a stable equilibrium, putatively making the sudden worsening or change less likely. Stability of variability can only be observed in this condition and is clearly distinct from other scenarios. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the neuroplasticity makeup affects the variability of the oscillatory synchrony. This i) informs the shaping of the electrophysiological makeup and ii) might serve as a marker for clinical behavior.

Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders treatment in Africa: The current status, outcomes, and challenges.

Movement disorders (MDs), a diverse group of neurological conditions characterized by abnormal and involuntary movements, have a profound impact on individuals, families, and healthcare systems. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a promising therapeutic intervention, offering relief from symptoms and improved quality of life. By implanting electrodes in specific brain regions and connecting them to a pulse generator, DBS modulates aberrant neural activity underlying these disorders. While DBS has gained recognition globally, its utilization in African countries remains limited. This comprehensive article presents the results of a literature review on the status of DBS therapy for MDs in Africa. The review assesses treatment outcomes, patient demographics, and challenges tied to implementing DBS in the African context. The findings reveal promising developments in DBS therapy across several African countries, particularly in treating Parkinson's disease and dystonia. However, challenges related to awareness, access to specialized care, and a scarcity of expertise still impede broader adoption. The article underscores the urgent need for collaborative efforts, policy changes, and increased training to expand the reach of DBS therapy, thus mitigating the burden of MDs on the African continent.

Brain Shift during Staged Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a routine neurosurgical procedure utilized to treat various movement disorders including Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), and dystonia. Treatment efficacy is dependent on stereotactic accuracy of lead placement into the deep brain target of interest. However, brain shift attributed to pneumocephalus can introduce unpredictable inaccuracies during DBS lead placement. This study aimed to determine whether intracranial air is associated with brain shift in patients undergoing staged DBS surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 46 patients who underwent staged DBS surgery for PD, ET, and dystonia. Due to the staged nature of DBS surgery at our institution, the first electrode placement is used as a concrete fiducial marker for movement in the target location. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) images after the first electrode implantation, as well as preoperative, and postoperative CT images after the second electrode implantation were collected. Images were analyzed in stereotactic targeting software (BrainLab); intracranial air was manually segmented, and electrode shift was measured in the x, y, and z plane, as well as a Euclidian distance on each set of merged CT scans. A Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between intracranial air and brain shift, and student's t test was used to compare means between patients with and without radiographic evidence of intracranial air. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients had pneumocephalus after the first electrode implantation, while 35 had pneumocephalus after the second electrode implantation. Accumulation of intracranial air following the first electrode implantation (4.49 ± 6.05 cm3) was significantly correlated with brain shift along the y axis (0.04 ± 0.35 mm; r (34) = 0.36; p = 0.03), as well as the Euclidean distance of deviation (0.57 ± 0.33 mm; r (34) = 0.33; p = 0.05) indicating statistically significant shift on the ipsilateral side. However, there was no significant correlation between intracranial air and brain shift following the second electrode implantation, suggesting contralateral shift is minimal. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in brain shift between patients with and without radiographic evidence of intracranial air following both electrode implantation surgeries. CONCLUSION: Despite observing volumes as high as 22.0 cm3 in patients with radiographic evidence of pneumocephalus, there was no significant difference in brain shift when compared to patients without pneumocephalus. Furthermore, the mean magnitude of brain shift was <1.0 mm regardless of whether pneumocephalus was presenting, suggesting that intracranial air accumulation may not produce clinical significant brain shift in our patients.

Deep brain stimulation in pediatric dystonia: calls for therapeutic realism over nihilism.

PURPOSE: Pediatric dystonia (PD) has a significant negative impact on the growth and development of the child. This study was done retrospectively to analyze functional outcomes in pediatric patients with dystonia who underwent deep brain stimulation. METHODS: In this retrospective analytical study, all the patients of age less than 18 years undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) for dystonia between 2012 and 2020 in a single center were analyzed and their functional outcomes were measured by the Burke-Fahn-Marsden-dystonia-rating-scale (BFMDRS). RESULTS: A total of 10 pediatric patients were included with a mean age of onset, duration of disease, and age at surgery being 5.75 years, 7.36 years, and 13.11 years, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 23.22 months. The mean pre-DBS motor score was 75.44 ± 23.53 which improved significantly at 6-month and 12-month follow-up to 57.27 (p value 0.004) and 50.38 (p value < 0.001), respectively. Limbs sub-scores improved significantly at both the scheduled intervals. There was a significant improvement in disability at 1-year follow-up with significant improvement in feeding, dressing, and walking components. There was a 27.34% and 36.64% improvement in dystonia with a 17.37% and 28.86% reduction in disability at 6 months and 12 months, respectively. There was a positive correlation between the absolute reduction of the motor score and improvement in disability of the patients at 6 months (rho = 0.865, p value 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: DBS in PD has an enormous role in reducing disease burden and achieving a sustainable therapeutic goal.

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in primary Meige syndrome: motor and non-motor outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a promising treatment for movement disorders. This prospective study aims to evaluate the effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS (STN-DBS) on motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with primary Meige syndrome. METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent bilateral STN-DBS between April 2017 and June 2020 were included. Standardized and validated scales were utilized to assess the severity of dystonia, health-related quality of life, sleep, cognitive function and mental status at baseline and at 1 year and 3 years after neurostimulation. RESULTS: The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale movement scores showed a mean improvement of 63.0% and 66.8% at 1 year and 3 years, respectively, after neurostimulation. Similarly, the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale disability scores improved by 60.8% and 63.3% at the same time points. Postoperative quality of life demonstrated a significant and sustained improvement throughout the follow-up period. However, cognitive function, mental status, sleep quality and other neuropsychological functions did not change after 3 years of neurostimulation. Eight adverse events occurred in six patients, but no deaths or permanent sequelae were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral STN-DBS is a safe and effective alternative treatment for primary Meige syndrome, leading to improvements in motor function and quality of life. Nevertheless, it did not yield significant amelioration in cognitive, mental, sleep status and other neuropsychological functions after 3 years of neurostimulation.

A scoping review on the diagnosis and treatment of X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism.

INTRODUCTION: X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism (XDP) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that has been studied well in recent years. OBJECTIVES: This scoping review aimed to describe the current state of knowledge about the diagnosis and treatment of XDP, to provide clinicians with a concise and up-to-date overview. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of pertinent literature on the diagnosis and treatment of XDP using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. RESULTS: There were 24 articles on diagnostic methods and 20 articles on therapeutic interventions for XDP, with 7 review articles describing both. The detection of the SVA retrotransposon insertion within the TAF1 gene is confirmatory for XDP. Oral medications are marginally effective. Chemodenervation with botulinum toxin is an effective treatment. Pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been shown to provide significant improvement in the dystonia and quality of life of patients with XDP for a longer time. A less invasive surgical option is the transcranial magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (tcMRgFUS), which has shown promising effects with the limited number of case reports available. CONCLUSION: XDP is a geneti disorder characterized by striatal symptoms and pathology on neuroimaging. No effective oral medications are available for the management of XDP. The use of botulinum toxin is limited by its cost and duration of effects. As of now, pallidal DBS is deemed to be the best option. Another promising option is the tcMRgFUS but still has limited studies on its safety and efficacy in XDP.

Quality of life outcomes after deep brain stimulation in acquired dystonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dystonia is a condition that affects the ability to control the movement and function of the body's muscles. It can cause not only physical problems, but also mental problems, resulting in impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, the effect of deep brain stimulation on quality of life in acquired dystonia remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review from January 2000 to October 2022，determined the eligible studies, and performed a meta-analysis of HRQoL outcomes based on the Short-Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) after DBS to evaluate the effects of DBS on physical and mental QoL. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria and were systematically reviewed. A comprehensive meta-analysis was performed for 9 studies that reported physical and psychological data or physical component summary (PCS), or mental component summary (MCS) for SF-36. The mean (SD) age at DBS implantation was 34.29 (10.3) years, and the follow-up period after implantation was 2.21 (2.80) years. The random effects model meta-analysis revealed that both physical and mental domains of the SF-36 improved following DBS. There was no statistically significant difference between the physical domains (effect size=1.34; p<0.0001) and the mental domains (effect size=1.38; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: This is the first meta-analysis that demonstrates significant benefits in HRQoL following DBS in patients with acquired dystonia. There were significant improvements in both physical QoL and mental QoL.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Pediatric Dystonia: Clinicians' Perspectives on the Most Pressing Ethical Challenges.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric deep brain stimulation (pDBS) is commonly used to manage treatment-resistant primary dystonias with favorable results and more frequently used for secondary dystonia to improve quality of life. There has been little systematic empirical neuroethics research to identify ethical challenges and potential solutions to ensure responsible use of DBS in pediatric populations. METHODS: Clinicians (n = 29) who care for minors with treatment-resistant dystonia were interviewed for their perspectives on the most pressing ethical issues in pDBS. RESULTS: Using thematic content analysis to explore salient themes, clinicians identified four pressing concerns: (1) uncertainty about risks and benefits of pDBS (22/29; 72%) that poses a challenge to informed decision-making; (2) ethically navigating decision-making roles (15/29; 52%), including how best to integrate perspectives from diverse stakeholders (patient, caregiver, clinician) and how to manage surrogate decisions on behalf of pediatric patients with limited capacity to make autonomous decisions; (3) information scarcity effects on informed consent and decision quality (15/29; 52%) in the context of patient and caregivers' expectations for treatment; and (4) narrow regulatory status and access (7/29; 24%) such as the lack of FDA-approved indications that contribute to decision-making uncertainty and liability and potentially limit access to DBS among patients who may benefit from it. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that clinicians are primarily concerned about ethical limitations of making difficult decisions in the absence of informational, regulatory, and financial supports. We discuss two solutions already underway, including supported decision-making to address uncertainty and further data sharing to enhance clinical knowledge and discovery.

Proprioceptive Modulation of Pallidal Physiology in Cervical Dystonia.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that botulinum toxin can alter proprioceptive feedback and modulate the muscle-spindle output for the treatment of dystonia. However, the mechanism for this modulation remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a study involving 17 patients with cervical dystonia (CD), seven of whom had prominent CD and 10 with generalized dystonia (GD) along with CD. We investigated the effects of neck vibration, a form of proprioceptive modulation, on spontaneous single-neuron responses and local field potentials (LFPs) recorded from the globus pallidum externus (GPe) and internus (GPi). RESULTS: Our findings demonstrated that neck vibration notably increased the regularity of neck-sensitive GPi neurons in focal CD patients. Additionally, in patients with GD and CD, the vibration enhanced the firing regularity of non-neck-sensitive neurons. These effects on single-unit activity were also mirrored in ensemble responses measured through LFPs. Notably, the LFP modulation was particularly pronounced in areas populated with burst neurons compared to pause or tonic cells. CONCLUSION: The results from our study emphasize the significance of burst neurons in the pathogenesis of dystonia and in the efficacy of proprioceptive modulation for its treatment. Moreover, we observed that the effects of vibration on focal CD were prominent in the α band LFP, indicating modulation of pallido-cerebellar connectivity. Moreover, the pallidal effects of vibration in GD with CD involved modulation of cerebro-pallidal θ band connectivity. Our analysis provides insight into how vibration-induced changes in pallidal activity are integrated into the downstream motor circuit. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Electrophysiological insights into deep brain stimulation of the network disorder dystonia.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS), a treatment for modulating the abnormal central neuronal circuitry, has become the standard of care nowadays and is sometimes the only option to reduce symptoms of movement disorders such as dystonia. However, on the one hand, there are still open questions regarding the pathomechanisms of dystonia and, on the other hand, the mechanisms of DBS on neuronal circuitry. That lack of knowledge limits the therapeutic effect and makes it hard to predict the outcome of DBS for individual dystonia patients. Finding electrophysiological biomarkers seems to be a promising option to enable adapted individualised DBS treatment. However, biomarker search studies cannot be conducted on patients on a large scale and experimental approaches with animal models of dystonia are needed. In this review, physiological findings of deep brain stimulation studies in humans and animal models of dystonia are summarised and the current pathophysiological concepts of dystonia are discussed.

Generalized Dystonia Due to a Pathogenic THAP1 Variant Showing Sustained Response to Globus Pallidus Deep Brain Stimulation.

A 21-year-old woman of south Asian origin presented with cervical dystonia which had progressed over the previous three years. Her symptoms started as writer's cramp since the age of seven years. She did not respond to medications and needed botulinum toxin injection for generalised dystonia. Subsequent whole genome sequencing revealed a likely pathogenic c.98G>A p.(Cys33Tyr) heterozygous variant in the THAP1 gene. She underwent bilateral posteroventral globus pallidus interna (GPi) deep brain stimulation (Medtronic Activa PC) implantation at the age of thirty-one years. She responded well to the deep brain stimulation even after more than 8 years post-surgery though she needs botulinum toxin injection for her cervical dystonia.

What have we learned about the biology of dystonia from deep brain stimulation?

Deep brain stimulation has dramatically changed the management of patients with dystonia, therapeutic approach of dystonia with marked improvement of dystonia and functional disability. However, despite decades of experience and identification of good prognosis factors, prediction of beneficial effect at the individual level is still a challenge. There is inter-individual variability in therapeutic outcome. Genetic factors are identified but subgroups of patients still have relapse or worsening of dystonia in short or long term. Possible "biological factors" underlying such a difference among patients are discussed, including structural or functional differences including altered plasticity.

Machine versus physician-based programming of deep brain stimulation in isolated dystonia: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation of the internal globus pallidus effectively alleviates dystonia motor symptoms. However, delayed symptom control and a lack of therapeutic biomarkers and a single pallidal sweetspot region complicates optimal programming. Postoperative management is complex, typically requiring multiple, lengthy follow-ups with an experienced physician - an important barrier to widespread adoption in medication-refractory dystonia patients. OBJECTIVE: Here we prospectively tested the best machine-predicted programming settings in a dystonia cohort treated with GPi-DBS against the settings derived from clinical long-term care in a specialised DBS centre. METHODS: Previously, we reconstructed an anatomical map of motor improvement probability across the pallidal region using individual stimulation volumes and clinical outcomes in dystonia patients. We used this to develop an algorithm that tests in silico thousands of putative stimulation settings in de novo patients after reconstructing an individual, image-based anatomical model of electrode positions, and suggests stimulation parameters with the highest likelihood of optimal symptom control. To test real-life application, our prospective study compared results in 10 patients against programming settings derived from long-term care. RESULTS: In this cohort, dystonia symptom reduction was observed at 74.9 ± 15.3% with C-SURF programming as compared to 66.3 ± 16.3% with clinical programming (p < 0.012). The average total electrical energy delivered (TEED) was similar for both the clinical and C-SURF programming (262.0 µJ/s vs. 306.1 µJ/s respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the clinical potential of machine-based programming in dystonia, which could markedly reduce the programming burden in postoperative management.